Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has. Margaret Mead

All bar one Devon Conservative MPs vote in favour of massive cuts to councils AGAIN

Wednesday, 22 February 2017 2 Comments by Claire

Every Devon Conservative MP voted in favour of massive cuts to councils this afternoon, except Anne Marie Morris who abstained.

This includes Hugo Swire, who today rather ironically tweeted an article starting with the sentence: “I’m not very rebellious by nature and I don’t think I have ever defied the party whip…”

Devon County Council had written to Devon MPs last month, urging them to vote against the crippling cuts for the third year running and I had written to Hugo Swire also for the third year running, with exactly the same request.

Last night, Devon County Council leader, Cllr John Hart told the BBC he thought the government handling of the local government finance arrangements was a “shambles” because the council was legally forced to set its budget before even receiving the details of the latest round of funding from government.

Then the funding news was received at 11pm on Monday night just 36 hours before MPs would be examining the information for debate and vote in parliament.

John Hart although a conservative council leader, has the guts to stand up to his party seniors at Westminster and openly criticise them. Something he does often and he should be given credit for this.

What a shame our MPs aren’t made of similar stern stuff.

On a more serious note, and this is serious, I was pretty shocked at the paltry numbers of MPs who were present for the debate this afternoon. I think I counted about 30, for what should have been an absolutely key parliamentary sitting as its impact on constituents, especially vulnerable people, is likely to be significant.

Local government secretary of state, Sajid Javid uttered a few warm but empty words about what a fine job councils do, before explaining that they will get no government funding whatsoever after 2019. They will be expected to survive on business rates and council tax income only after this.

This is the seventh year of austerity and Devon County Council has now lost over half of its budget to government cuts. It has coped as best it can but studying the risk assessments in the budget scrutiny papers last month made for sobering reading.

Read here for more detail: http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/fewer_devon_people_to_receive_social_care_as_23m_is_slashed_from_budgets

Returning to the subject of the sadly expected but weak-willed vote by East Devon’s MP, Hugo Swire, how can he justify on the one hand complaining about underfunding for social care - the responsibility of Devon County Council and underfunding of our schools - also under Devon County Council - and then be absent during the parliamentary funding cuts debate, sneaking to the lobby only afterwards to vote in favour of the cuts?

The answer is he can’t. He has simply proved once again that he puts his party before his constituents.

Every time.

Comments

1. At 09:58 am on 23th Feb Ben Piper wrote:

It is truly shocking how few people recognise that ‘Austerity’ is an:
a) an ideological choice
b) an economic disaster.
Thank you for your revealing picture of the disgusting Mr Swine (sorry is that a typo?) and his arrogance so typical of a class of politicians who see such behaviour as acceptable -when in reality it is institutionslised corruption which is seriously corroding what remains of the social contract-very best to you -Ben

2. At 11:30 am on 23th Feb Chris Wakefield wrote:

What a bunch of useless wimps. They have certainly removed the ‘local’ from the epithet ‘local politician’. Such a gutless performance at Westminster makes an odd contrast with the Pulmans News report of our gallant Sir H swashbuckling his way to some extra funding to move Tipton School to Ottery. That is a result of sorts (although I don’t think ‘moving’ was really what anyone wanted) and he might get some credit for that. But perhaps Hugo has been taken behind the bike sheds at Westminster and told that he can have a few shillings to save his face, but not to cause any trouble for the big boys and girls who are keen to see the back of local authorities. I don’t know for sure, but I would wager there is, even beyond the whips, a slightly sinister ‘disciplinary’ atmosphere to curb any whiff of dissidence from Tories in the shires.

John Hart clearly feels no such constraint - and he thus reminds us of an older Tory tradition of local effort, the desire to serve a community rather than himself, and looking for a legacy of improving the lot of those among whom he lives. It’s the kind of paternalism that those of my persuasion would once have railed against but now seems like the epitome of radical opposition. I don’t know whether I’ve suggested this before among my comments on this blog - but I’ve certainly thought it - that local Tories could move out of their party if they really want to get some traction on the plans of the heavy mob at Westminster. It depends I suppose of the question of loyalty - in the end, is it Party First or People First?

Submit A Comment

© 2014 www.claire-wright.org | designed and developed by i-mouse web design